# Anatomy and Function of the Mammalian Claustrum

## Historical Discovery and Gross Anatomy

### Early Neuroanatomical Identification

The claustrum is a thin, irregular, sheet-like structure of gray matter situated deep within the basolateral telencephalon. Its physical boundaries are defined by its encapsulation between two prominent white matter tracts: the extreme capsule medially, which separates the claustrum from the insular cortex, and the external capsule laterally, which separates it from the putamen [cite: 1, 2]. The anatomical identification of the claustrum dates back to the 17th century, appearing in the neuroanatomical drawings of Thomas Willis in 1672 [cite: 3]. However, the structure was first formally described by Karl Friedrich Burdach in the early 19th century, utilizing drawings by Félix Vicq-d'Azyr, who termed the region the "vormauer" or "hidden away" structure [cite: 3, 4].

Despite centuries of awareness regarding its existence, the claustrum remained functionally enigmatic due to its obscured anatomical position, its convoluted three-dimensional shape, and its diminutive width [cite: 1, 4]. The structural proximity to major white matter tracts and the insula precluded the use of traditional invasive methodologies, such as macroscopic surgical excision or rudimentary electrical stimulation, without introducing severe off-target physiological confounds [cite: 5, 6, 7]. The categorization of the claustrum also presents historical challenges; while it possesses fusiform cells and pyramidal somata indicative of pallial cortical derivation, it lacks canonical cortical lamination and contains cellular subtypes traditionally associated with subcortical basal ganglia structures [cite: 3, 4, 8].

### Morphological Divergence Across Species

The claustrum is identified in all placental mammals, several monotremes, and potentially possesses structural homologs in reptiles and birds [cite: 6, 9]. Despite this widespread conservation across mammalian taxa, the gross morphology and continuity of the claustrum exhibit substantial evolutionary divergence [cite: 6, 10].

In rodents, such as the laboratory mouse and rat, the claustrum forms a continuous, uninterrupted subcortical sheet that extends across the rostral half of the telencephalon [cite: 1, 4]. However, anatomical investigations utilizing advanced neuroimaging and histological reconstructions reveal that this physical continuity is not conserved universally, particularly in species characterized by highly gyrified cortices [cite: 6, 10]. In macaque monkeys and gorillas, the claustrum exhibits pronounced structural discontinuities, often presenting as a main nuclear body surrounded by isolated islands of claustral cells [cite: 6, 10]. This morphological fragmentation reaches its extreme in cetaceans, such as dolphins and whales, where the claustrum exists almost entirely as a scattered archipelago of isolated cellular islands [cite: 6, 10]. The presence of these physical discontinuities poses a direct architectural constraint on functional hypotheses that rely on ubiquitous intraclaustral communication, such as models proposing continuous gap-junction syncytia or uninterrupted chemical wave propagation across the structure's longitudinal axis [cite: 6, 11].

### Volumetric Ratios and Asymmetry

As the cerebral cortex expands in complexity and volume across mammalian evolution, the relative size of the claustrum inversely scales [cite: 6, 10]. Comparative volumetric analyses indicate that the ratio of the volume of the claustrum to the volume of the isocortex is highest in rodents, comprising approximately 6.5% in mice [cite: 6]. In contrast, the human claustrum accounts for merely 0.25% to 0.45% of the total cerebral cortical volume [cite: 3, 6]. 

In the human brain, the claustrum extends approximately 22 millimeters inferior-to-superior and 38 millimeters anterior-to-posterior [cite: 3]. High-resolution neuroimaging utilizing T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reveals consistent hemispheric asymmetry in the human claustrum. The right claustrum possesses an average surface area of 1,551.15 mm² and a volume of 828.83 mm³, whereas the left claustrum is generally smaller, with a surface area of 1,439.16 mm² and a volume of 705.82 mm³ [cite: 3, 12]. This structural lateralization is hypothesized to mirror the lateralization of specific cortical functions, such as language processing and handedness, with functional MRI data indicating differential activation patterns between the left and right claustra depending on the cognitive task [cite: 12, 13, 14].

## Cellular Composition and Microarchitecture

### Projection Neurons and Inhibitory Interneurons

The internal microarchitecture of the claustrum is devoid of the strict laminar organization characteristic of the adjacent cerebral cortex [cite: 2, 8]. Instead, the claustrum is composed of a dense matrix of neurons that are broadly categorized into principal excitatory projection neurons and local inhibitory interneurons [cite: 9, 15].

The principal cells are predominantly spiny, glutamatergic projection neurons, often classified as Golgi type I neurons [cite: 2, 9]. These cells project divergent axons that penetrate the white matter tracts to heavily innervate various regions of the cerebral cortex [cite: 1, 9]. In molecular studies, these excitatory projection neurons are identified by the robust expression of specific genetic markers, notably the guanine nucleotide-binding protein gamma-2 subunit (Gng2) and vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (Vglut2) [cite: 1, 8]. The expression of Gng2, in particular, has been utilized in murine models to delineate the precise anatomical boundaries of the claustrum against the surrounding cortical gray matter, which conversely expresses high levels of the crystallin mu (Crym) marker [cite: 1].

Interspersed among the glutamatergic projection neurons are multiple diverse subpopulations of aspiny, GABAergic interneurons [cite: 9, 15]. These inhibitory interneurons are typically differentiated by their expression of calcium-binding proteins and neuropeptides, including parvalbumin (PV), somatostatin (SOM), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) [cite: 9, 15]. 

### Synaptic Connectivity and Syncytial Organization

The parvalbumin-positive (PV) interneurons form an exceptionally dense, highly interconnected local network within the claustrum. These fast-spiking interneurons are linked by both classical chemical synapses and electrical gap junctions, creating a widespread inhibitory syncytium [cite: 15, 16]. 

This intrinsic GABAergic matrix strongly innervates the claustral projection neurons, exerting profound baseline suppression [cite: 4, 15, 16]. Extracellular single-unit recordings in awake animals reveal that claustral projection neurons are remarkably quiescent, exhibiting very low spontaneous discharge rates in the absence of external stimulation [cite: 4, 12, 16]. This microcircuitry suggests a highly regulated gating mechanism: significant, synchronized, and task-relevant top-down cortical input is required to overcome the local PV-mediated inhibition and trigger an efferent burst from the claustrum projection neurons [cite: 15, 16].

### Single-Cell Transcriptomics in Non-Human Primates

Recent large-scale spatial transcriptomic projects have provided unprecedented resolution regarding the cellular taxonomy of the claustrum. Specifically, the China Brain Project generated a comprehensive single-cell spatial transcriptome atlas of the macaque claustrum [cite: 17, 18]. By sequencing over 227,000 individual claustral cells utilizing stereotactic RNA sequencing (Stereo-seq) and single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq), researchers systematically identified 48 distinct transcriptome-defined cell types within the structure [cite: 19, 20, 21].

This molecular mapping revealed that the majority of the glutamatergic projection neurons in the macaque claustrum exhibit significant transcriptomic similarities to the deep-layer neurons of the adjacent insular cortex [cite: 17, 19]. This supports developmental models positing that the claustrum and insula share a common pallial origin, diverging later in embryogenesis [cite: 3, 17]. Furthermore, extensive cross-species transcriptomic comparisons between macaques, marmosets, and laboratory mice identified several macaque-specific cell types entirely absent in rodents [cite: 17, 19]. These primate-specific glutamatergic cell types exhibit highly specific topographical localizations—with distinct ventral versus dorsal claustral zones—that preferentially co-project to functionally related cortical areas, such as the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus versus the motor cortex and putamen [cite: 19].

#### Table 1: Primary Cellular Subpopulations of the Mammalian Claustrum

| Cell Type Category | Primary Molecular Markers | Morphology | Anatomical Projection | Function |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Principal Excitatory Neurons** | Gng2, Vglut2, Slc17a6 | Spiny, pyramidal, or fusiform | Extraclaustral (Corticoclaustral and Claustrocortical) | Divergent output to cortical networks; primary signal transmission [cite: 1, 8, 9]. |
| **Fast-Spiking Interneurons** | Pvalb (PV) | Aspiny | Intraclaustral (Local) | Mediates feedforward/feedback inhibition; highly electrically coupled via gap junctions [cite: 9, 15, 16]. |
| **Peptidergic Interneurons** | Sst (SOM), Vip | Aspiny | Intraclaustral (Local) | Modulates local excitability; targets specific dendritic domains of projection neurons [cite: 9]. |
| **NPY Interneurons** | Npy | Aspiny | Intraclaustral (Local) | Participates in global silencing of neocortex during specific cognitive states [cite: 16, 22]. |

## Macroscale Connectomics and Network Topology

The functional capabilities of the claustrum are inextricably linked to its extensive connectivity profile. Advancements in both viral tract tracing in animal models and high-angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) in humans have mapped the claustrocortical and corticoclaustral pathways with high precision, confirming the claustrum as a primary integration node [cite: 23, 24, 25].

### Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Density

Quantitative analyses of human connectome data utilizing resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and structural diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) demonstrate the sheer magnitude of the claustrum's wiring. In a large-scale study of 100 healthy subjects conducted by Torgerson and Van Horn, the claustrum was found to possess the highest density of white matter fiber connections per unit of regional volume of any structure in the human brain [cite: 3, 26, 27]. 

Tractography reconstructions reveal four primary groups of white matter fibers connecting the human claustrum to the cerebral cortex: anterior, posterior, superior, and lateral tracts [cite: 24]. The anterior and posterior pathways link the claustrum to the prefrontal cortex and visual areas, respectively; the superior tract targets sensorimotor cortical regions; and the lateral pathway connects with the auditory cortex [cite: 2, 24]. Additionally, a distinct medial pathway was identified linking the claustrum to subcortical basal ganglia structures, specifically the caudate nucleus, putamen, and globus pallidus [cite: 24].



### Graph Theory and Rich-Club Organization

The application of graph theoretical metrics to these DTI datasets illustrates that the claustrum is not merely a highly connected region, but a primary contributor to global brain network architecture [cite: 3, 27]. By calculating metrics such as network density, characteristic path length, assortativity, and betweenness centrality, researchers confirm that the claustrum operates as a critical "rich-club" node [cite: 3, 28, 29]. 

In network topology, a "rich club" refers to a phenomenon wherein highly connected hub nodes are also densely connected to one another [cite: 28, 30]. These hubs serve as the backbone for global communication, facilitating extremely short communication pathways across diverse neural networks [cite: 28, 29]. Structural mapping in mammalian connectomes demonstrates that rich-club and feeder connections spanning through the claustrum comprise the vast majority of intermodule communication paths [cite: 28]. Resting-state functional analyses corroborate this structural scaffolding, revealing that the claustrum actively co-activates with core neurocognitive networks, including the Salience Network (SN), Default Mode Network (DMN), and the Frontoparietal Network (FPN) [cite: 26, 31].

[image delta #1, 0 bytes]



### Asymmetry in Input and Output Projections

While early qualitative models assumed the claustrum was connected uniformly to all cortical areas, systematic quantification using adeno-associated virus (AAV) anterograde tracing and monosynaptic rabies virus retrograde tracing by the Allen Institute for Brain Science has refined this understanding [cite: 23, 32]. 

In the murine model, the data reveal a profound input-output asymmetry heavily biased toward executive and limbic loops. The claustrum receives its strongest inputs from frontal cortices—including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and orbital frontal cortex—as well as from specific subcortical neuromodulatory centers such as the dorsal raphe nucleus (supplying serotonergic input) and the cholinergic basal forebrain [cite: 32, 33, 34]. 

Conversely, the efferent outputs of the claustrum collateralize extensively to innervate higher-order cortical regions, particularly the retrosplenial cortex, prefrontal areas, and cingulate cortices [cite: 32, 34]. While it projects densely to these association areas, the claustrum sends proportionally weaker outputs back to primary sensory (visual, auditory) and motor cortices [cite: 32, 33]. Furthermore, claustrocortical outputs are generally devoid of significant subcortical targeting; with the minor exception of sparse terminal fields in the basolateral amygdala (BLA), the claustrum's output is overwhelmingly directed back to the neocortex [cite: 32]. 

These projections are also characterized by hemispheric biases. While bilateral connections are present, the vast majority of claustrocortical projections are ipsilateral [cite: 8, 23, 35]. Interestingly, retrograde tracing indicates that individual claustral neurons often branch to innervate multiple distinct cortical targets, allowing a single claustral output burst to simultaneously influence disparate functional networks [cite: 32, 36]. 

#### Table 2: Structural Connectivity Profile of the Mammalian Claustrum

| Brain Region / Network Node | Input Extent to Claustrum | Output Extent from Claustrum | Primary Functional Associations |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Prefrontal Cortex (mPFC, OFC)** | Strong (Bilateral, ipsilateral bias) | Strong | Executive function, cognitive control, task switching, working memory [cite: 32, 33, 35]. |
| **Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC)** | Strong (Bilateral, ipsilateral bias) | Strong | Salience detection, attentional allocation, conflict monitoring [cite: 15, 32, 37]. |
| **Primary Sensory Cortices (V1, A1)** | Weak to Moderate (Ipsilateral) | Weak | Direct sensory relay, low-level environmental feature extraction [cite: 33, 35]. |
| **Primary Motor & Somatosensory** | Minimal | Minimal | Direct motor execution, somatic tactile processing [cite: 33, 35]. |
| **Hippocampal / Retrohippocampal** | Strong (Ipsilateral) | Strong | Spatial navigation, episodic memory consolidation [cite: 32, 35]. |
| **Basolateral Amygdala (BLA)** | Moderate | Weak (Sparse terminals only) | Emotional salience, fear conditioning, affective processing [cite: 32, 34]. |
| **Brainstem Neuromodulatory Nuclei** | Moderate to Strong (Raphe) | None | Global state regulation, arousal, monoaminergic modulation [cite: 8, 32]. |

*Note: Relative projection density derivations are synthesized from quantified AAV anterograde and rabies retrograde tracing datasets mapped within the Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework [cite: 32, 33, 35].*

## The Consciousness Hypothesis and Its Constraints

For decades, the claustrum was relegated to an anatomical curiosity. However, in 2005, Francis Crick and Christof Koch fundamentally shifted the trajectory of claustrum research by publishing a seminal hypothesis positing that the structure represents the central neural correlate of consciousness [cite: 2, 22, 38, 39]. 

### Crick and Koch’s Multisensory Integration Model

Observing the extreme density of reciprocal connections linking the claustrum to visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices, Crick and Koch theorized that the claustrum acts as a highly active site of multisensory integration [cite: 2, 38]. They argued that the subjective experience of consciousness requires disparate sensory modalities and motor intentions to be rapidly and seamlessly bound together into a unified percept. Utilizing the metaphor of an "orchestra conductor," they suggested that the claustrum coordinates the timing and integration of distant cortical areas, generating the unity of consciousness moment by moment [cite: 22, 38, 39]. Without the claustrum, they hypothesized, cortical processing would remain fragmented and non-conscious [cite: 38].

### Electrophysiological Evidence Against Individual Neuron Integration

While elegant and theoretically cohesive, the strict multisensory integration model requires empirical evidence of multisensory convergence at the cellular level. Subsequent highly targeted electrophysiological investigations have largely failed to support this requirement.

Extracellular single-unit recordings in the macaque claustrum demonstrate that while the structure, when viewed as a whole, responds to both visual and auditory stimuli, the individual constituent neurons are overwhelmingly unimodal [cite: 22]. A claustral neuron responsive to visual stimuli does not exhibit altered or potentiated firing rates when an auditory stimulus is concurrently presented [cite: 22, 40]. The lack of cross-modal modulation indicates an absence of multisensory integration at the level of the individual cell [cite: 22]. Furthermore, tracing data in rodents shows that while the primary visual cortex sends dense projections to the claustrum, the primary somatosensory cortex sends minimal projections, breaking the symmetry required for a universal sensory integrator [cite: 22, 39]. 

### Human Lesion Studies and Traumatic Brain Injury

If the claustrum were the absolute anatomical generator or singular seat of consciousness, severe bilateral damage to the structure should theoretically result in a persistent vegetative state, coma, or complete abolition of conscious experience. Clinical case studies and cohort analyses do not support this absolute correlation.

Studying focal claustral lesions in human patients is exceptionally challenging due to the structure's diminutive width and its shared middle cerebral artery vascular supply with the adjacent insula and putamen [cite: 1, 5, 41]. Consequently, lesions exclusively restricted to the claustrum are extraordinarily rare. However, systemic reviews of patients with relatively isolated bilateral claustral damage—often resulting from viral encephalitis or severe status epilepticus—reveal highly variable deficits that do not manifest as a total loss of consciousness [cite: 5, 42].

The most definitive data addressing this hypothesis stems from a voxel-based lesion symptom mapping study of 171 combat veterans who sustained penetrating traumatic brain injuries (TBI) [cite: 41, 43]. Chau and colleagues analyzed long-term recovery and consciousness metrics, discovering that while claustrum damage was statistically associated with a prolonged *duration* of a loss of consciousness (LOC), it was not correlated with the *frequency* or initial occurrence of LOC compared to control lesions [cite: 41, 43]. 

### Network Anticorrelations with Brainstem Arousal Centers

These lesion data heavily imply that the claustrum is not the generator of consciousness, but rather a vital node within the broader neural circuitry required to regain or maintain states of high arousal following severe neurological disruption [cite: 41, 43]. Functional connectivity analyses mapping coma-inducing brain lesions further contextualize this role. Snider and colleagues demonstrated that the bilateral claustrum operates as a peak node within a distributed cortical circuit that is strongly anticorrelated (negatively correlated) with the dorsal brainstem tegmentum, the established location of the reticular activating system [cite: 5, 22, 44]. Damage to this distributed circuit heavily predicts LOC, suggesting the claustrum is structurally linked to the maintenance of basic wakefulness, even if it does not single-handedly generate subjective awareness [cite: 22, 44].

## Contemporary Models of Claustral Function

As the strict multisensory integration model lost empirical favor, neuroscientists developed several nuanced hypotheses to explain the claustrum's dense connectivity. These contemporary models focus on the structure's capacity to synchronize oscillations, filter environmental salience, and rapidly instantiate higher-order cognitive networks.

### Spectral Processing and Oscillation Synchrony

Smythies, Edelstein, and Ramachandran proposed an oscillation-synchrony theory, arguing that the claustrum functions not to integrate specific sensory content, but to operate as a detector, amplifier, and modulator of synchronized cortical oscillations [cite: 8, 36, 39, 45]. 

In this model, when an unexpected or salient stimulus generates weak gamma-band oscillations in disparate cortical regions, the claustrum detects this nascent synchrony [cite: 36, 39]. Utilizing the dense gap-junction syncytium formed by local claustral interneurons, the claustrum amplifies these specific frequencies via reverberating claustrocortical loops [cite: 1, 36, 39, 45]. Through a process termed spectral concatenation, the claustrum synchronizes multi-regional firing rates, effectively providing a competitive "winner-takes-all" mechanism allowing specific neural networks to gain access to the executive motor cortex for behavioral output [cite: 11, 46]. 

Despite its theoretical strength regarding neural oscillations, a major limitation of this hypothesis is its reliance on continuous, uninterrupted intraclaustral interactions (e.g., dendrodendritic synapses or gap junctions traveling the entire length of the structure). The discovery that the claustrum is physically fragmented into discontinuous islands in great apes and cetaceans fundamentally undermines the necessity of contiguous internal syncytial processing for its core mammalian function [cite: 6, 10].

### Salience Detection and the Limbic-to-Motor Interface

A subsequent functional model, proposed by Mathur, Goll, and colleagues, posits that the claustrum functions primarily as a salience or novelty detector [cite: 15, 37, 47]. Because claustral projection neurons are typically quiescent but respond rapidly and transiently to the onset of sudden, multimodal stimuli, the structure is ideally suited to act as an environmental filter [cite: 8, 15, 22].

This model heavily emphasizes the claustrum's exceptionally robust, bilateral connectivity with the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), which is a core node of the brain's Salience Network (SN) [cite: 37, 47]. Under this framework, the ACC provides the claustrum with top-down expectations regarding task relevance and environmental rules. When a highly salient stimulus breaches a predetermined threshold, the claustrum is activated and subsequently broadcasts an inhibitory signal across the cortex to suppress task-irrelevant background noise [cite: 8, 22, 37]. For example, activating this circuit allows an organism to rapidly ignore auditory distractions during a highly demanding visual task, effectively acting as a limbic-to-motor interface for rapid attentional shifts [cite: 8, 22, 37].

### Network Instantiation in Cognitive Control

Synthesizing recent anatomical, optogenetic, and functional neuroimaging data, the most comprehensive contemporary framework is the Network Instantiation in Cognitive Control (NICC) model, articulated by Madden et al. (2022) [cite: 9, 48]. The NICC model proposes that the claustrum does not process or relay specific sensory content; rather, it serves as a central orchestrator directed by the frontal cortex to rapidly instantiate (assemble, reset, and synchronize) the large-scale cortical networks required for high cognitive demand [cite: 9, 16, 48].

The NICC model outlines a specific three-step electrophysiological mechanism:
1.  **Initiation via Frontal Input:** The claustrum receives a top-down signal from frontal executive cortices (such as the mPFC) indicating a necessary shift in cognitive demand, task rules, or environmental context [cite: 9, 16].
2.  **Transformation and Amplification:** This incoming signal activates the sparse, highly interconnected PV-positive interneuron network within the claustrum, which transiently releases the principal projection neurons from their baseline inhibition, amplifying the neural command [cite: 9, 16].
3.  **Broadcasting and Instantiation:** The claustrum fires divergent, high-frequency bursts back to disparate cortical nodes across the telencephalon. Crucially, these claustral efferents predominately target cortical inhibitory interneurons (e.g., NPY and PV cells in the cortex). This unique targeting evokes widespread, transient feedforward inhibition across the neocortex, forcing a brief "down-state" that silences ongoing asynchronous activity [cite: 9, 16, 49]. As the feedforward inhibition lifts, the target cortical regions rebound into a synchronized, phase-locked "up-state," successfully instantiating a new functional network (such as the Frontoparietal Network) perfectly suited to the novel cognitive task [cite: 9, 16, 49].

[image delta #2, 0 bytes]





### Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging During Cognitive Tasks

The NICC model is strongly supported by recent task-based fMRI data from human cohorts. Analyses of healthy participants engaged in highly cognitively demanding tasks—such as the Stroop task, the multi-source interference task (MSIT), the AX-Continuous Performance Task (AX-CPT), and cued task-switching paradigms—reveal that claustrum activation scales directly with cognitive load [cite: 13, 14, 50]. 

Specifically, the claustrum exhibits pronounced bilateral activation precisely during the transition periods between distinct tasks (network switching) and during high-conflict trials [cite: 13, 14, 50]. In these moments, the claustrum acts in concert with task-positive frontoparietal networks to establish the neural architecture necessary for goal-directed execution, actively suppressing default mode networks and reducing cognitive interference [cite: 13, 14, 50].

#### Table 3: Evolution and Comparison of Major Claustral Functional Hypotheses

| Functional Model | Primary Proponents | Proposed Core Mechanism | Critical Empirical Limitations |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Seat of Consciousness / Orchestra Conductor** | Crick & Koch (2005) [cite: 2, 38] | Binding of multimodal sensory inputs into a unified conscious percept. | Single neurons are overwhelmingly unimodal; bilateral lesions alter duration, not presence, of consciousness [cite: 22, 40, 43]. |
| **Spectral Concatenation** | Smythies, Edelstein (2012) [cite: 39, 45] | Amplification of synchronized gamma oscillations via intraclaustral gap-junction syncytia. | Relies heavily on continuous intra-claustral architecture, contradicted by fragmented morphology in apes and cetaceans [cite: 6, 11]. |
| **Salience / Novelty Detection** | Mathur, Goll (2015) [cite: 15, 37] | Transient bursting in response to novel stimuli suppresses irrelevant cortical noise. | Does not fully explain the claustrum's continuous functional connectivity with resting-state networks (DMN, FPN) in absence of novel stimuli [cite: 26]. |
| **Network Instantiation in Cognitive Control (NICC)** | Madden et al. (2022) [cite: 9, 48] | Frontally-directed feedforward inhibition forces asynchronous cortices into synchronized functional networks. | Challenging to selectively manipulate the entire claustrum *in vivo* to definitively prove causal network shifts without accidentally affecting the adjacent insula [cite: 9, 16]. |

## Neuropathology and Clinical Implications

Because the claustrum acts as a global modulator of cortical excitability and cognitive network instantiation, its dysfunction is increasingly implicated in a wide range of severe neurological and psychiatric disorders.

### Epileptogenesis and the Claustrum Sign

The claustrum's intrinsic capability to trigger widespread cortical synchronization renders it highly vulnerable—and potentially contributory—to epileptogenesis. In clinical neurology, the "claustrum sign" is a well-documented, highly specific radiological phenomenon wherein patients suffering from refractory status epilepticus (unremitting, continuous seizures without recovery of consciousness) or severe febrile illnesses exhibit bilateral T2/FLAIR hyperintensity localized precisely to the claustrum on MRI scans [cite: 5, 51]. 

It is hypothesized that the ventral subsector of the claustrum, owing to its dense, reciprocal connections with limbic structures such as the amygdala and entorhinal cortex, facilitates the rapid propagation and generalization of focal limbic seizures across the entire cortical mantle [cite: 51]. The disruption of typical claustral functioning during these massive synchronization events likely contributes directly to the profound loss of awareness and confusion observed during complex partial and generalized seizures [cite: 51, 52]. Following acute status epilepticus, patients with persistent claustrum lesions frequently experience long-term alterations in mental state, including profound disorientation and stupor, even if motor function recovers [cite: 5, 42].

### Delusional Syndromes and Psychiatric Disorders

Disruptions in the functional connectivity between the claustrum and the prefrontal cortex have been noted in several psychiatric conditions characterized by severe deficits in cognitive control, particularly schizophrenia and major depressive disorder [cite: 53]. In perceptual-inference models of psychosis, hallucinations and delusions are thought to result from alterations in the neural updating of internal models of the environment [cite: 54]. The claustrum's dense involvement in the Frontoparietal and Default Mode Networks positions it perfectly to mediate these internal models.

The claustrum's potential role in maintaining a unified sense of internal state and self-representation is highlighted by its association with exceedingly rare delusional states. Structural damage to the claustrum has been directly linked to clinical instances of the Cotard delusion—a severe psychiatric condition wherein the patient firmly believes they are dead, do not exist, or are actively decaying [cite: 5]. This suggests that a structural breakdown in the claustrum's ability to coordinate the Default Mode Network may result in profound perceptual dissociations regarding one's own physical existence and "selfhood" [cite: 5].

### General Anesthesia and Cortical Disconnection

The claustrum also plays a highly specific modulatory role in states of decreased arousal. In naturally occurring states, the structure is integral in coordinating widespread synchronous slow-wave activity (SWS) across the neocortex during sleep [cite: 22, 41]. 

Furthermore, pharmacological studies highlight the claustrum's unique sensitivity to anesthetics. Resting-state fMRI networks involving the claustrum—which form robust structural scaffolds during normal wakefulness—are entirely abolished under isoflurane and propofol-induced general anesthesia [cite: 37, 41]. Because the claustrum is densely packed with GABAergic interneurons, it is highly receptive to the mechanisms of action of common general anesthetics. This suggests the claustrum is a primary pharmacological target for anesthetic agents aiming to safely decouple higher-order cortical networks, effectively severing the brain's ability to instantiate the synchronized states required for waking consciousness [cite: 41]. Similarly, the application of classical psychedelics (such as psilocybin or Salvinorin A) has been shown to induce profound disintegration of brain-wide networks primarily by driving a rapid decrease in claustrum activity or altering its inhibitory influence on subcortical areas [cite: 7, 49, 53].

## Methodological Challenges and Future Research

### Limitations of Current Investigative Techniques

Despite rapid conceptual advances over the last two decades, studying the claustrum remains fundamentally hindered by its challenging anatomy. Its location, tightly sandwiched between the massive white matter tracts of the external and extreme capsules, and its structural contiguity with the deep layers of the insular cortex in many species, complicate the use of traditional neuroscientific techniques [cite: 1, 9, 23]. 

Standard electrical deep-brain stimulation or gross excitotoxic lesioning often results in electrical spillover or chemical diffusion into the adjacent white matter or insula, leading to confounding experimental results regarding the claustrum's genuine role in consciousness, pain processing, and sensory arrest [cite: 5, 9, 22]. Furthermore, the lack of standardized boundaries in rodent models often results in the adjacent endopiriform nucleus (which primarily handles olfactory processing) being erroneously categorized as the "ventral claustrum," further muddying the functional literature [cite: 6, 23].

### Advancements in Optogenetics and Targeted Neural Manipulation

Future research relies heavily on the deployment of advanced intersectional genetics. By utilizing Cre-driver transgenic mouse lines that target claustrum-specific molecular markers (e.g., Gng2, Vglut2) or specific primate-adapted transcriptomic signatures, researchers can deploy optogenetics and chemogenetics (DREADDs) to selectively excite or silence precise populations of claustral projection neurons with millisecond temporal precision [cite: 8, 22, 23]. 

Initial optogenetic studies have already demonstrated that activating claustral inputs to the prefrontal cortex can transiently inhibit cortical pyramidal activity via local neuropeptide Y (NPY) interneurons, providing vital cellular-level evidence for the NICC model [cite: 16]. Furthermore, observing claustral activity in awake, behaving non-human primates during complex, multi-stage cognitive tasks via high-density electrophysiology will be vital [cite: 8, 15, 40]. By transitioning from static anatomical tracing to dynamic, cell-type-specific functional manipulation, the claustrum is shedding its reputation as the enigmatic "seat of consciousness." Through the synthesis of spatial transcriptomics, macroscale connectomics, and dynamic network modeling, the claustrum has instead emerged as an elegant, highly specialized integration hub essential for the agile orchestration of mammalian cognitive control.

## Sources
1. [Quantitative data from the Allen Institute](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5324679/)
2. [Tiny Blue Dot Foundation - Consciousness Project](https://www.tinybluedotfoundation.org/research/projects/examine-the-role-of-the-claustrum-and-its-cell-types-in-the-full-neural-correlates-of-consciousness-ncc)
3. [Allen Institute Brain Map Details](https://alleninstitute.org/news/an-ultra-detailed-map-of-the-brain-region-that-controls-movement-from-mice-to-monkeys-to-humans)
4. [Quantitative connectivity analysis via AAV tracing](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27223051/)
5. [DCM structural and effective connectivity](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.09.07.674759v1.full-text)
6. [China Brain Project mapping of macaque single cells](https://www.thestar.com.my/aseanplus/aseanplus-news/2025/04/22/mapping-the-mind-chinese-and-french-scientists-advance-on-neural-origins-of-consciousness)
7. [Mapping the Mind - SCMP](https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3306387/mapping-mind-chinese-and-french-scientists-advance-neural-origins-consciousness)
8. [Single-cell transcriptomics of primate claustrum](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40185102/)
9. [Macaque Digital Brain Project](https://macaque.digital-brain.cn/)
10. [Large scale monkey brain atlas bioRxiv](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.23.485448.full)
11. [Kinesis Magazine on Crick's hypothesis](https://kinesismagazine.com/2018/01/27/francis-crick-and-the-case-for-claustrum-and-consciousness/)
12. [Claustrum lesion studies and consciousness (Atilgan)](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9166552/)
13. [Claustrum as the seat of consciousness](https://mapadelaconsciencia.es/en/theory/claustrum-as-the-seat-of-consciousness/)
14. [The effect of claustrum lesions on human consciousness](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280102811_The_effect_of_claustrum_lesions_on_human_consciousness_and_recovery_of_function)
15. [Role of claustrum in consciousness via synchronization](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10493512/)
16. [Madden et al. 2022 Network Instantiation Model](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36192309/)
17. [Claustrum in Cognitive Control fMRI](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12617337/)
18. [Claustrum activation in task-switching bioRxiv](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.20.624607v1.full-text)
19. [Network Instantiation in Cognitive Control (NICC) detailed](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9669149/)
20. [OSF Download on Madden 2022 model](https://osf.io/download/nurv7)
21. [The Claustrum book by Smythies](https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Claustrum.html?id=GvccAgAAQBAJ)
22. [Smythies Edelstein claustrum model mechanisms](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3905198/)
23. [Smythies hypothesis of synchronized oscillations](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/integrative-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnint.2012.00053/full)
24. [Claustrum as detector and integrator](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3410410/)
25. [Book review of Smythies structural/functional theory](https://inhn.org/inhn-projects/books/books/john-smythies-lawrence-edelstein-and-vilayenur-ramachadran-reviewed-by-john-smythies)
26. [Spectral processing in claustrum](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3905198/)
27. [Crick & Koch hypothesis review within Smythies context](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/integrative-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnint.2012.00053/full)
28. [Claustrum anatomy limits](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7058237/)
29. [The Claustrum Structural Functional book overview](https://inhn.org/inhn-projects/books/books/john-smythies-lawrence-edelstein-and-vilayenur-ramachadran-reviewed-by-john-smythies)
30. [Smythies et al. original 2012 fnint paper](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22876222/)
31. [Baizer evolutionary constraints of the claustrum](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00117/full)
32. [Organization of claustrum in apes and cetaceans](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4079070/)
33. [Input output organization of claustrum via AAV/rabies](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6196111/)
34. [Claustrocortical structural mapping](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5324679/)
35. [In vivo CSD tractography of human claustrum](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256470227_Cortical_and_Subcortical_Connections_of_the_Human_Claustrum_Revealed_In_Vivo_by_Constrained_Spherical_Deconvolution_Tractography)
36. [Systematic review of claustrum lesion symptoms](https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/145/5/1610/6555047)
37. [Brainstem connections and consciousness LOC](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7268053/)
38. [Claustrum lesions and mental states](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387507/full)
39. [Recovery of function post-claustrum lesion](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280102811_The_effect_of_claustrum_lesions_on_human_consciousness_and_recovery_of_function)
40. [Claustrum's role in epilepsy and status epilepticus](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-biology/articles/10.3389/fsysb.2024.1385112/full)
41. [Madden et al. 2022 Cognitive control mechanism](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36192309/)
42. [NICC model evidence and hypothesis testing](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9669149/)
43. [fMRI studies of human claustrum activation](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397610591_The_Human_Claustrum_Activates_Across_Multiple_Cognitive_Control_Tasks)
44. [NICC model comparison to existing hypotheses](https://osf.io/download/nurv7)
45. [Claustrum and cortical network switching](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12617337/)
46. [Mathur salience processing model of the claustrum](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroanatomy/articles/10.3389/fnana.2019.00064/full)
47. [Rodent claustrum salience network homolog](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6594418/)
48. [Lack of multisensory integration within individual neurons](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10493512/)
49. [Claustrum as a saliency filter](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00048/full)
50. [GABAergic circuits and novelty detection in the claustrum](https://www.jneurosci.org/content/37/45/10877)
51. [Critique of claustrum hypotheses via anatomy](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00117/full)
52. [Limits of current claustrum functional hypotheses](https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/145/5/1610/6555047)
53. [Comparisons of claustral functionality](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3410410/)
54. [Review of rat claustrum morphology](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7058237/)
55. [NICC model details and constraints](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9669149/)
56. [Methodological challenges in manipulating the claustrum](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10493512/)
57. [Inhibitory microcircuits in the claustrum](https://osf.io/download/nurv7)
58. [Abnormalities of claustrum in psychiatric disorders](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364061798_A_role_for_the_claustrum_in_cognitive_control)
59. [Claustrum resting state functional connectivity](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11025802/)
60. [Torgerson & Van Horn highest connectivity graph theory](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25339630/)
61. [Connectomics history and macroscale claustrum mapping](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25426062/)
62. [Rich-club organization in the mammalian brain](http://www.dutchconnectomelab.nl/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/de_Reus_van_den_Heuvel_2013_Rich_Club_Organization_and_Intermodule_Communication_in_the_Cat_Connectome.pdf)
63. [Rich-club domains and neuropsychiatric conditions](https://www.ncau.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Rich-Club-with-Autism-and-ADHD.pdf)
64. [Rabies and AAV tracing of claustrum networks](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6196111/)
65. [Connectomics analysis of white matter](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroinformatics/articles/10.3389/fninf.2014.00083/full)
66. [Claustrum AAV projection density analysis](https://www.scienceopen.com/document_file/d2cc8b52-ed57-4387-9fd8-76339a5ab77b/PubMedCentral/d2cc8b52-ed57-4387-9fd8-76339a5ab77b.pdf)
67. [ROI-to-ROI functional connectivity claustrum](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/705350v1.full)
68. [Pre-synaptic input organization of mouse claustrum](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327875487_Input-output_organization_of_the_mouse_claustrum)
69. [Smythies model updates and clarifications](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3905198/)
70. [Reevaluation of Crick Koch and Smythies models](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/integrative-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnint.2012.00053/full)
71. [Smythies book contents and overview](https://inhn.org/inhn-projects/books/books/john-smythies-lawrence-edelstein-and-vilayenur-ramachadran-reviewed-by-john-smythies)
72. [Academic Press The Claustrum text details](https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Claustrum.html?id=GvccAgAAQBAJ)
73. [Concatenation sum of oscillations in claustrum](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3905198/)
74. [Mismatch signal processing within the syncytium](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/integrative-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnint.2012.00053/full)
75. [Historical ignorance of the claustrum](https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Claustrum.html?id=GvccAgAAQBAJ)
76. [Layer 6 input and Layer 4 output dynamics](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7058237/)
77. [Pearson system and "winner-takes-all" synchronization](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncel.2015.00443/full)
78. [Critique of multisensory integration in individual cells](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10493512/)
79. [Lack of layered organization in claustrum](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00048/full)
80. [Incomplete evidence for multimodal claustral responses](https://elifesciences.org/articles/98002)
81. [Issues with electrical stimulation specificity in humans](https://kinesismagazine.com/2018/01/27/francis-crick-and-the-case-for-claustrum-and-consciousness/)
82. [Modularity of inputs to the claustrum](https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/98002)
83. [Cotard delusion and claustral pathology](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9166552/)
84. [Combat veteran TBI study on loss of consciousness](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26186439/)
85. [Neural correlates of arousal versus claustrum lesions](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280102811_The_effect_of_claustrum_lesions_on_human_consciousness_and_recovery_of_function)
86. [Alteration of awareness via electrical stimulation](https://aesnet.org/abstractslisting/alteration-of-consciousness-due-to-electrical-stimulation-of-the-claustrum-in-the-human-brain)
87. [Torgerson structural neuroimaging graph theory](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4324054/)
88. [Brain network architecture dependencies](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25339630/)
89. [Rich club physical embedding costs](http://www.dutchconnectomelab.nl/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Collin2014_Structural_and_functional_aspects_relating_to_cost_and_benefit_of_rich_club_organization_in_the_human_cerebral_co.pdf)
90. [Development of rich club hubs](https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/12371250/1324118111.full.pdf)
91. [Claustrum micro-connectomics transition](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25426062/)
92. [Proximity limitations in manipulating claustrum](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9669149/)
93. [Whole-brain functional imaging over tract tracing](https://osf.io/download/nurv7)
94. [Psychedelic-induced decrease in claustrum activity](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364061798_A_role_for_the_claustrum_in_cognitive_control)
95. [AX-CPT and Sternberg task performance fMRI](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.20.624607v1.full-text)
96. [DMCC55B dataset utilization for cognitive analysis](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.20.624607v1)
97. [Volumetric measurements of the human claustrum](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4324054/)
98. [Asymmetries in claustral shape across species](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00117/full)
99. [Coactivation of claustrum in retrieval fluency](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11025802/)
100. [Review of anatomical terminology and connections](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claustrum)
101. [Resting state functional networks coactivation](https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298349)
102. [Arguments against integration vs magnification](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/integrative-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnint.2014.00007/full)
103. [Claustrum mismatch signal processing](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/integrative-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnint.2012.00053/full)
104. [Layer specific connectivity gradients](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7058237/)
105. [Functional interactions and sexual arousal](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4227511/)
106. [Perceptual-inference models of psychosis](https://elifesciences.org/articles/56151)
107. [Allen Mouse Brain CCF mapping](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5324679/)
108. [Crown of thorns connectivity motif](https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/98002v1)
109. [CTB retrograde labeling of CLA neurons](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327875487_Input-output_organization_of_the_mouse_claustrum)
110. [AAV tracer methodologies](https://www.scienceopen.com/document_file/d2cc8b52-ed57-4387-9fd8-76339a5ab77b/PubMedCentral/d2cc8b52-ed57-4387-9fd8-76339a5ab77b.pdf)
111. [Search parameters Allen Institute](http://search.brain-map.org/search/index.html?query=Claustrum)

**Sources:**
1. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHxsJDSRac-pJwPK2B6F1BubLBv1_qBi32EzNt1u0o2G0M02oWtJNEQNvN57zjxxRObvgApXO3ckFtLb7li9oR4pI2ar570omW0rsvP0Us8zIh7L8udd2jVQjV8ZL-o8OSuztLtlaSN)
2. [wikipedia.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQE0wutUTsHkLQ3FbF2yLwuKHsTZM6nXJUeQZzV_a7Qq2ugc2cMegZaWurB9MEKGqdaI2GQwUiaav592_YAkvLWISJmnj45PUDEvLpWhO0bYpJjF-P8kEclSoor9AoQ=)
3. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFx2ITNAkg78AiDmeDHM_lEk6rq0QA2eOuttorXSk58O_FFBmJirSaWG5139CWZisCyXIhPyaNeXpTrE6L19fmRDWUCj3Cf1_m2bXA2KxD42g19BwgdVcxa3yYqC98AVTokvLeuvZ0D)
4. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEJylVW59DsPRwIRNhwa_viV6jGqhTQBjSCaqVrMA1e5wgB0PoKB2NGVNbABzQlQ1M38_k9Ku9ImzhdIJEU0eVUJt3NYt79ojony53CWU9jemHeejQUVa-fllYvwhMl1t-4dxLdAvHr)
5. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHFNJ4DZJe46R8uiHZRTZ514X2u1SINhfATwWSpp7WjkWJhQtbXzVY5y5zWmXUvtCa8LbOvjpCr9tmfu1ksRnH5LEGUy9kaZ3bxccL3BRQh-FYAvw3CORGLG07wS60J2AjUH8NwLM1y)
6. [frontiersin.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHamlzQj4qVonk5RCOmG0pJm2rB62-guBfzkpYOATF26B_87ms5gzvDcSguwhFkNQC8_rtOeqsSe_I0Dflb5K-6SwTADx7B352TO04Nqgly-HfOoz-FjH7GuK8wucu-2FSXglBJ0lqW8www-hda1W9q4JoidOo2QDo8RCEoAq3-Xix6G7oN8To9W4SIo29lCpyglU5oDzY=)
7. [kinesismagazine.com](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEwDfSEMDyCErQVYgBubq_2QRXUkyICyfH6et4hCNJjFGIPaMOtIH8iHBeq_qhq0w5amDendzuCK5hv-Z1IIqbExgaWIDp2dWzsh-aHWXSWdpAxMvxPa7ELeXtqoTDWLSIDUcbga0Ug0lpFEvci8wdTiVPY4-MGxk7dSzQSPkjNY8B0nxS6I69iuKzx9zPET15RpMBGxdc7Gw==)
8. [frontiersin.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHxyO9AvJNuDHz21hgAtVUungHRR_L9rCeBpE_4YAoAiVcSmHQTuoatjUn9EgzgdWT5WrHkv1eCPjzl3jxFfwOOQkaH1XaNn2xHykERD13Gyaa657_WX0o_7t85wZHRiyefOSuGMrufVkdYpYcu_-tLSxDw8CEKJzf5QgMZ94D4iZhcL6unhl2QBOJZmx0MGwjko3wXsaw=)
9. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEFbdu96VZUJJDJt0omr8BizyZlSkiocP7JbJS3BAYYHAaLAp4SHK0seW3G4sbz6o1paqee3MelLiBuXigXcz5TMHLbhUgact227BljVWoOu9dIUtcGw4Gmes_mXyM8vb3lpmmAy5JD)
10. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQH8Jo8m8bI_x9gI0gyW4oSSfEnXRqhUV0mA5uMEbDsoCTdoXMDMgHc2WojlpFnp0VGOWwbi3c26F_KML3AFTN50azfhEWS2Qq1knJkDyDy74wKujKfYG-XBAaLO8PcZnX4s_hUEBxDz)
11. [frontiersin.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFA5XZgQupnAArW-GJstBfh1AoO3QHQclzOP58f8DeyIhAU2-s8cb0T-PJBuhY_VmsleWU1mw9cctq60H9qJZcSGiwrQWGZQuX-ycJV0xpKMrs9Mek4I5viDBmSZgoP1Z7LmI0gff-46QKpZKGivNGGnp7v8YCk5gMlvSIRC2Rex4oiYYfrC-xg_DlpKCwzAdVREVrW_r0k)
12. [frontiersin.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQED3VoHT12rR9xL3iPnuKdeC_GbzDYVe4lGpweqpsG35ixuZgH_-5NZ62a6_orP4dUWl0DaDQ-dKHy1jCx0-nMxPnAVO3Gy-WkcKnDEclO35Vx7IpaIw0xr3B-M1fzlVIG9B5ZzB4sD2CQ30gSI6hNhaVy0sB4A47tFGk7kjsGZhTaaOWkkA5nWPbjAQZJFLgWa4g==)
13. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFFP3kGScuY90DT1hP_QIL1pm-4OXJztK1w0xJSLzGlk9F4AtWXiJgv2E7rNAiw1bcCV8VCNoe0-es5ImwSpL-ci5W4hWSYXabzmBhihtX8P0kiKiNbJFWTwxznDKGvm4JA3mIPrAh0BA==)
14. [biorxiv.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHN-GEY8HQNbbV0setgBU7RvGnQBWkj2OAPIZF5mtfa6RkYfgBbhXiZAdQsAfzZ0_tuVXLuJNfz01IDQWPonKU9FwOo3DAYin12d4aacB3i8Ikg9MQwiv_vQClnFMHCF9w_oUVdUzFkYFCN66O58ODMjSB9WTNu-O0Z7dA=)
15. [jneurosci.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHelBXX0zl48Kibq3Z3I-DNe0ossd6Brvn1ScmvVdisImDwHWqfDf3Hd3k13hCKvE_CmpCYCOXsAqQiwOWK7cE8k6aqNlNmJCeLZLGd-F_WNUCLSBSfFduE5Cg2j7UOpHY6ACk=)
16. [osf.io](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFILaT3DgCnWDySAA8fY60N9HwP21fxl4H0fJJF8AybEBlU7Wm4IuWadmPBzDjXfQoM-UQZEnDMemHZfb-PAJP_e8Zh1MyoKntfUnBjdmFFpfamjg==)
17. [thestar.com.my](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEPFwzT12jWlqyzE6mUcu6RAb1XJ1bXV7djlnxcjGKf-kyo3tCZslJlQtWtEmsfUH4kg-LP_Z2h052Q9Y54sV2U1ZVf5cwZ0tqlhqioPvsBwYbzbTtm9OvM0Ci-VAQwLuCfBuIPSIM-FJ9VdxPjDFhYYTvBDwBFMvZkztOkDVNmGHOP2WB9BM9XaDkzE0416xxC6k1hKZWom9maSuYI0qag_J9Z6onxe7Qw1-FMc0hP1JvDbj0XfEvcnjXHHEVg4qEKh18SlUWS0zs9VNwr2Dg=)
18. [scmp.com](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFNteqj0VUfnzrmObqGF0awSm6MsFweQZxhIqpibTAeTVZphbt05yePzNp6SsMROqs2E-AdkTnR-2W_vlZwRaulu7TOFB2erg6JyOiAdpgJLycmSVPxiGGWohqwjvw-oVvlBlz6QavEBbzwsqksZ0GbVhRN_R7Km4k-0G997R-l_vD80jzX99C-cccE3zNDz9x6vUaGR_FdWD5lmebBLHAXjgkcg6HzRz0ZSXdhQa0iKw5Kt_HJii-_qqLIHZzL)
19. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGAxPVNXXTaQhOnE6ig4oz2KHqUNpvNzMpGwc3R4y10LwQPxa49lgMoVe94qh9y8K2DJ6DdZyoEhh0Y3kPcmvGeLuX513B72_g_tnMnLvDc3Wk4oDrnomhPUDZ8wtzV4aC9xW_c_loMjwnMgEs34jGHG31un9gzWZwx_02YSZNXCm8TCjiV6Oc8kBJZohcYWxVdXrvkpKHN068-EgMIf85djZLYCHxQZIKW-x8Bjq7MB0v-TF1KaneDTgFzgTHqQlORnK36NyZrSbcD31T5gZeanPCErCdPHZ4StoznLp_ynRCJqWqMjzFMsvtfwzwuPy-gBSIJFuT3a9OEA-lD2Mfqs04kgpaSzw==)
20. [digital-brain.cn](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHoeXDlwt1WiVvrzgGq-rbqHPs0_pT0z6PlZINasEObK7CTV7u2gIhTbarVhVLfFihywfn6X7JOWJLpgOL1yT4InXNSFonNpMwULMvZ5smo5NcisDDV4hM=)
21. [biorxiv.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEy8c3yRiNQAv7FR3KuLyXOd5JtRcluBCs3Jp16GLzRQDSVadjOVpgJeKB1NjrEypPpBQ4JBb25jZXXwjTdxYLQm8i1SKQeYoDQCq7-ej9T7d2AInXcj8TvZV93-noIQGLaZzlP23Eb-72DxpfUsL8WZ23LxA==)
22. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEgJVBYIfkR77ii4U49vutArzo3P0R594emxk4-SntjaFhgGvvngfxyR3KY0Icfvu-2w3Edyo3nN6qNyzfUM4OrKloYo0QozstLMsGaO9E_Zq9GUNv9o5SSdh_smi4YbSPDOZQAxV8iGg==)
23. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGyX0s9sLgYIhPNBdsNKsz6z3A-uiTO7MC9WlsxzzP-taIjiLD3QC5xG4cV_gOV2IQt2owiFSoMZybxJV2vqDdUSOSzy20zGCQYVoN2vWhMcKapnYYEhQu5Z6n_i-XEzwmAjMduczAA)
24. [researchgate.net](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFrCmaGjYkymhMa9RRjupAUeIxz1BcLalbeN_kBMNfG2KEWYiBz11ZRWWnIKNMOP5VYs3zJW3XeeZXiNESnucE6eobr2WR8cy-9Ui_RUbi1I64RSXIq75OtsQPS0PJXlkmTYEJHzHpueCcTVB1O5HNSNvEIi97NnzQiHiBZwiFnlRS4sGn5SJDkFJq0A9b3QB3cOuKHJ0XyWGX6BygnuPtxovd5mD-YQfpppxNNfPce7gJeKv3teGGpwV8NkTKFXtJP5CSqPjPCKGeTkLoCpqDaBFkKER3-oVJJF4VQMTDxjqckV-94doJ8z4c=)
25. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEBX3k3kZDwdSxlyJH6lv03CPdGbh3gStlQ-EYWB2zMJkt4kMVwAl3VMmcSBQm21KSjgJaXbx3kJZ7v6wcT831VSWsHrlWpfTDTxi7pw3N_FqQi7eXcmc1az4hubTzr5Q==)
26. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHAIU6B78U7QG5f5cll15oR9CN46ICYnFmWwhN6FmUDjbUoL_1s5M5t9dsWkCOX-ytItwom5W0mQg-QylruEt1vzRPSlpNuwx57wAK8oFqoNkdD8oSPkN2yuPpbII1HCFA5F5Pnzm_GYA==)
27. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGKGqS4bI6E0k4KLWhnJQZDKCTB3OvCWGWklBlFpAjiEsiHXI-7Y_MZ0yPG2W1XrnKBBiPmydeOiGgYxpz3P86G6nGB7JKFOVYDYeOPgfvfmrqHXdFKe_uHEvbXLMPOvg==)
28. [dutchconnectomelab.nl](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHCKBQGPIHj8h68hPXdPdEgbjkU3UzT8ZLSj8qevZTEGJA3BGJlVHcb_RPbN0aC3quUc8zWnsT5X4uEp7mtTpK8Qwyu63qnr34WDm0E6z_fpElcYwQ15bB7LY3FUXZ0qr8sVxHkBWFxWQBHdItIDBct2-eUa3t6dOd651VIDrZu_tQyipZFCCeCDfgPbfD-NfLI3XTAyyO6HBSm5FU4GxxdAcyZCwy5UQkhZrPlmbsGEZMSBxCe4CTOe2oGzivpIjjCgu34z7f5APOVUB8WLlPX4OLjOsWaeIsjcQ1xpG--)
29. [dutchconnectomelab.nl](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQH0dM3dOQi_t0CzDm_9pb4mHf0uHRNJ2vkN5Gh4MQZfmBpxoSCuVRaDsFUlsvPjbgBi6S_H7CeVN87Q4-LORGj1rnMGCq47Q-3uPLFDrPJh7rmiCUj9VrYyzHg823uiXjchYvx6CZYOZyst9XrRuq7tPgG9Sb6ygr3IYsXfFRMW1a5JBMTpBMgo4aiOhl8WODZPU0Q8Lxt7ddupwMFcBGpInc-EerFfv3DeBwBpvtSWZ8QiaQCHBbPJURotx_6zX9Xl5UhZqQkhV2RP4I6iL0dxoJhXiN6f36V0_rawtB2BLlN5IWh3EvD7kPrfSnMd2_pASRjRow==)
30. [ncau.com.au](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHvSV6PmHlTxuCp15NMTW6aks1L96INhuGxQWfkY10ZRxWtB0P59sHAdtb_KexzRjS-jmZ7A6RlKQNdtcasXXJ93PtIsAYVZSFs8PzrsjllM80KXLLQQPxOLNEBdizDVi1fl2I4VFpX4JFHRnJWGx7PEbEqXG3glDVckOO7b9O3AkNyv_TgjcRCPfiJ)
31. [plos.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHnn2qlnqCMEKNZp6NRT5Y7H6LvViOtRt0D5jxw0C7odQONzG2hhUB7WPYmSYS0Yof71bOTNIvWWpEiLqwOncCkIW0Qr1y74S4ehJyaowq6bXnHmMbpWgLbt-eDYmgqL6O6wMD09gz8XSQbuJQzdhM6LPVr9n2wpSdSjSa3rpgt)
32. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHKTgyysRlIp6StWHYUWPhozW072xWIFG8hIGaJPvRPOa8Ty2egt7iybP9uFLPq6JFU5VwT_-3Flff40bN1zAYDHTl7R4ced26Yu3sGYNek4Pclzev2TZdeqVZQYaOtATfnV2iaAJgw)
33. [scienceopen.com](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFuQCcBul8cJS3yleyOdQsoHADSOSkaRO7V3rIF0rcHit-mABshp6jHVcvQPMiPeWn9PRx-B_vmeUBYAP0jItX3rFv59fkHIcP1fpbRSWbq7R1krRxajhfqIAJlokIedux66SIjgoJyMPUJne9WBRCNTGMNUndyuZz8s-HXVw_qPzTDBR4dfcqwXIteCESmrK6a2bp0zGMZ4O3mJ1m4S4VgmGOfWDeYWZ_jaO1QMjn8O5HhRppUscUIP0xYKg==)
34. [researchgate.net](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQE91zIFd7bWAHR4v1TdPSO6HzSdNjz7lgY1WkYdc_UXIe1V-qBpe6ZT6jMvj__-s_pnlQbeXqbmX-pp0jxonBc803rF4dyRP_YHdOW0xH8IWJFjlbwfE7E3Vfoy2tnLiVciC1b7NpMFlMbNI0XqSedQVaTOgkqzliC3Hq7Cd0veu_1UXIdRAiMYXJKnfFeA3x4r8ZOSy8MI-uw=)
35. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQH6m22oi5BF04sWHC_H3NOl6zt1v-78Rl72OSXCD86WYBdNZloL2Qwp3UGbLDTeb8e3faG305UqcUqw9tMNaOAnqXPKrLu4qf5KxLkwZ-rN8fjaYvVxY3kuPsGlnjhgEA==)
36. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEhDSKz9kPqdrkJUCGMNGcyJ9cLWPKwMeyVeh3KCwUVDtGddQhLGOTKH23jTmht7IZ3f_9yxIxG0WzTWERcn2_LExOEsvs5CtjQ5l_Fv6z3VWEm1FAp-_UqGWgOEU_pYJxLhv2V8BZ9)
37. [frontiersin.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFTgECPuZ54LmPpv7x0g_E7qlAk9tkgSd8fXwlFk1m448gq0ZbSNtM6uDg7cRXZtA5fJV-b1hWISJCIX9OOtNgKNVNBzAZWlFfNQC-fYc5e-vz0CSY7WrJVlo_zSQ7yyylLGm4HCajOoH7heF7b7uISgAl7chxU_nIoQEHDQ-T-nwegqNmdIYOWyp0_mmqH)
38. [mapadelaconsciencia.es](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFsgv5neMjAkIUMF44foNR5dqLz27NtxZiaBWHHllcuWPrmXsRTPzjtzJQJwSnJ2SX46IyY75OEQCubBp_0K595QT7SNi1mmlpxY7pAFB4W9Sef-z_f29o1cCKFq1k22g3XhQ-Yb3Xrifdk4GYNeB9DtjObb1bQh94fJ7AYqCgPZ1JFpheC8w==)
39. [frontiersin.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHeSsPF9Y6ItxOtbJ_lFunQOo93kLX8ZvLrmw18yVEMaM_xaL4bGOAH-8qchHc3mBP0sx39TNOZ8dsEQ-Rrr8NX13tsPRFee9vS860rBBetyCEStoFnhQoSUAXtOLOETP-JzANe7tkFmnPbS-GBCZbD0k9fzm5bFneuaD7mWuBiAOaIBYthkqXGZNOcyoSF0jaMX95ufcBiWSJL)
40. [elifesciences.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGdnIcrZGqM0IE0IfJnmNO_mM1NcC2yaKvQwwJ3Of7djbLQahFExKU9x83mXp7ljJLaLdX-z4DK2XcgbFeV1i2SRc6e9sbzpvk9oGJmjh_X-viaKPNHjJQDiYC8pDNe)
41. [researchgate.net](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFI01r588DIEXHcIcA4OtkTJWErJ4Z_K4iaf8pBGvbdWrO1zroa29sW7kYnLYP7Ld2Yg_pd5YfrvK-mkcruEYK9ofcclz4biOkUtzPg1cAgohNx2aTPXg_ryIvlCMnSdV6lybB3JE62vurJCkKhDrjxSagRypbpiW6QB8NQHvlqIGdqJGYGobbjBuXFEAsyX01xsXAozMrd5h1pA0Vs6W2rBEnqA-qyx-3xIeFGUnp2LH7SyORRUk5ZwQ==)
42. [oup.com](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHa3iDWxacUdWPwxuwkF91-JMPiHeeUk37-Km_rFt8VHLoj7MTOx-zNgXuDAc0CWfrNKXeeimmMlMVOM42BHEaUe_WPtn0bGGTJ4yQ2KRE2MTT4vYHmcs-CgUknPrHSwUb_TR6VplSQkmPiiAK2I8E=)
43. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG4nJ-tRGzHuPqnLY1L9qSgq0AQ2dVyTGud5c2u-tlUes5D5mD02mdWzEenmb6vJhEc1HThaBwwmpe3UX6Xx1YapWIBfrQRfOsWmvninX8UFgpLKPhoBCwbsGmZczbpnA==)
44. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFgTj8dWB6w1kIwd6q_xvwm_oZi2yyl6eUB89CW6tojXgiXptMe94vBKjdW2Tu4rpBeipNb9HB6kTywDYnQwt1SzSVCx2H-qjVkT7j4dZk7AZkWpEGnQtr_TSRkRsUCegwkqLjMt5jo)
45. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHVW4DcLEZrtFodKuGAF1v_CdjkIf59hgJPpEeIAPggNTiV-ZjepX5xkMDWRIya2yOxA9ldQNKlYLjXj72Q_4libCdqJe_FTRjPwKEP1pR7blLl421voUrcHf11Y_tMDfxKAxoBdMgh)
46. [inhn.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGIkydHTfefRqX-jQwBbmQmjgV8QoIBMbzQWnrjLjJkGLQH5WsQpjS5t8XUGf5jayAAGAznrWX97t3iVqgQgIEOqFJ9Lk3_ZoQCnsVfrW2mrlTFfYCh9DBmbG4zEOAyJww7kN5G-4JFHf2es8Rl0OYjiV6PcUE6ceex1Izu4X-ruN3UzpdtONaDGs5Bur6paqMF_BeNPwzDRi7gOeSXcn5tlo90zGNCnl6veXBH4bv_HOEBqvR-)
47. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQH5dl8Ldt8Ikja3wxkKPNNmx9_7ikSDDkbgcePSJ7xZENJnd_FaFbM9rYqT548JJR54QqbI1pMYzLiurEblbS_dx9wqnJYhr9aeGWCaYSCffDoy2YRrCNyHv04WFplL2OxLQUSPIlGM)
48. [nih.gov](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFxEuCMp3nbRZZEzrC_niAaIRAQWM4HSjFYCIC_vNxT8N4gD8oarcpeHrWnQmM2AJs0t2xFBq0K-4VL9l-g6pHUOEO4kJQKkf7fBT-RPh2zBVx0qolHa_6y5hmKo4FTlA==)
49. [biorxiv.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEvjqyJYNpLQZLw-xNXrshz9GqXk4QeMuHBHrLSQ7WHckdAkThNzPodaqG4TWF2kIJxjy3se4ImeZSqhEeMFG1Phpl6N1EEDl1fbvHPwFYn3NyJxPQ9JOzwngaz2wezC7BOyjNc61NvffXJPOpfNJtJxGRRM9R1G3_BLNQ=)
50. [researchgate.net](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQERs_YlL1FgmFg2u66kZE1VjeMKUqCKnK8MMbV0WxKE7ud_CTQXKS5fSmKvXbZq3CDCItkoy_672AQd2FFEiGpZbc1kk9eNRz4uiagD-f_HsqGGOP2X1LrCxpyVcJdG5hTtOTk4IMIua8540UHlQG-65nt7wB24CXhdRafXyI-RLUNMVXa9S69xmSB-FTWPoGKDsk4Y0-EPfVKLvHSCW5nF_QVv1b5kdHYzpA8y3BI=)
51. [frontiersin.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGgzywBqoW6YsnKC7G0DPtQT_zWmtBp3av3zsYrZWBtKL0sGVDd5oCY_sSj1UuI-KHLE2r1ShiUb5hEVTSfnqfS9YpkvcARvnaA11tiUP_Z0bpdfMX_yjKS9HguyFJW9enTPUdYkt_xMiXwVLh9_Y-1Emn5dv7ChtG3ZRj03R13y5VYNxpcs76ogFcdhvQ_OmkMKQQ=)
52. [aesnet.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGN9RhK8GAA_mbSCAKryNWEpoN0g1JP_C9Bz4ucbnMONvqzbAo9GGDXJ21ML7OaKA8n1prXSpNQzYRWjzZSt7nP2TQm4jyk_s-YeBVnAUcaKhOL8w4RgaUaTCUJsKMoPI5Ey_RnOKxTZOl-W7-0m76ZBdakwk9DgVRjcglrUPLzCdHbjtyZ_ExuIIuj3Oeq41Wn9WUgt6HH2aNdXz7oWXH3cOF-2FXcUP2cyndOwLY_9cpcn0SUbEmr)
53. [researchgate.net](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFwUVWLfonPzgcHGk9AUN1cxYpkh_JDtkB5Xc0HaxbiLhV5exDvh72Oc0cVBpdLfodJZ5i8C7nvMWb7j2jd5etqvRj3HOoYKQ-3RjWTZMUGn85oo_Emn-xWlbmGddql1R9WlLon2EDc5iRmbyzLQs4uzEBGX7d_P0NAfJan_5PVhALcRx5GaMuU0_KEjoAQsGjyW5Ojyrw=)
54. [elifesciences.org](https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQF2AwT4zZTHjTsKFGwx-iWpc69smerutEtSkfxGGBONBHo1KdRGZWs0WnG6OOHL5fvGDXfOYwhjwDpiuYeQ3NFs8ZYbl0lcGqduu7g9iIvUVtLPf8BzkpABUFJZ73Qk)